ECB Seeks to Eliminate Stablecoins, Accelerate Digital Euro Plans

Stablecoin regulations and the launch of a digital euro seem to be ranking at the top of the European central bank’s list of priorities.  

Key Takeaways

The President of the ECB Christina Lagarde iterated hopes around the launch of a digital euro to complement cash.

Another report published by ECB’s Crypto-Assets Task Force aims to improve the stablecoin terminology and address the potential threats arising from the increasing adoption of various stablecoins. 

The total supply of existing stablecoins has tripled since the beginning of this year, surpassing $18.5 billion. 

The ECB’s President and crypto task force view stablecoins as a threat to the sovereignty of the central bank. Europe’s central bank is looking to accelerate plans for a digital euro to compete with stablecoins as a medium of payment and store of value. 

ECB Seeks a Digital Alternative to Euro 

In 2018, when she was the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Christine Lagarde first teased crypto-enthusiasts with a possibility of greater inclusion in the future.

As the President of ECB, she is looking to protect the sovereignty of central banks by keeping up with the demand for digitalization. In the introductory speech at the Franco-German Parliamentary Assembly on Sept. 21, Lagarde reaffirmed ECB’s plans to launch a digital currency. 

“A digital euro could be a complement to, not a substitute for, cash; it could provide an alternative to private digital currencies and ensure that sovereign money remains at the core of European payment systems,” she said. 

Lagarde has expressed similar views on many occasions in the past.

ECB Shuns Stablecoin Terminology 

The Crypto-Assets Task Force under the ECB has published a report addressing the implication, definition, and threat that comes with the widespread use of stablecoins.

Not all stablecoins are backed by fiat with a 1:1 ratio. Maker’s DAI, for instance, is not even backed by the fiat it represents. Instead, the token trends toward $1 by holding collateral in the form of other cryptocurrencies. 

Hence, the report states that the terminology of stablecoin is “misleading.”

The definition of these assets “should be replaced by a choice of terminology to shift the emphasis away from the issuer’s promise of stability,” according to the report. 

The Task Force sees the tokens’ utility from three perspectives. 

First, as a medium to aid cryptocurrency trading, second, as a mode of payment, and lastly, as a store of value. While the report reveals that stablecoins used in trading haven’t been problematic, the increasing use of payments and wealth protection threatens capital flight from central banks to private or public domains. 

Meanwhile, both domains are already well on their way, experimenting with various possibilities.

Recently, a French startup began work on a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) using Tezos for France’s national bank. The CBDC would be pegged to the euro. 

While China is leading with the world’s first digital currency built on blockchain, about 45 countries worldwide are in pursuit of launching similar initiatives. Just yesterday, financial regulators in the U.S. announced that they would allow banks to hold fiat deposits for stablecoin issuers. 

The move by the authorities represents their fear of losing capital control to private institutions with the rise of stablecoin supply. 

Disclaimer

Read More
Read Less

The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.

You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.

See full terms and conditions.

Source: cryptobriefing.com